- Pandora
- Compare Windows Solutions
- EaseUS Data Recovery Wizard vs Wondershare Recoverit
EaseUS Data Recovery Wizard vs Wondershare Recoverit
| 4.5.616 Released 4th Aug, 2022 | Current version |
| Windows 7-11 | Requirements |
| Recover up to 500 MB for free | Trial version limit |
| $75 $89 / Perpetual | Starting Price |
| 200,000 Found files Good 100% Corrupted 0% Lost 0% | Found files and Recovery quality |
| Easy | Usability |
3.81
3.43
| 15.6 Released 17th Aug, 2022 | Current version | 10.5.9 Released 13th Jul, 2022 |
| Windows 7-11 | Requirements | Windows 7-11 (x64 only) |
| Recover up to 2 GB for free | Trial version limit | Recover up to 100 MB for free |
| $69.95 / 1 monthSubscription + Lifetime | Starting Price | $59.99 / 1 monthSubscription + Lifetime |
| 199,970 Found files Good 100% Corrupted 0% Lost 0% | Found files and Recovery quality | 199,982 Found files Good 69% Corrupted 45% Lost 0% |
| Easy | Usability | Easy |
Introduction
EaseUS and Wondershare Recoverit both include an attractive and straightforward user interface to make the recovery of your data easy. But, looks aren’t everything. After all, an appealing user interface isn’t going to recover your data. Therefore, in this comparison, we put the two up against each other to see which can offer the most to its users.
We’ve already thoroughly reviewed each of these tools against specific data points. This comparison will be based on what each tool can objectively offer you to ensure it remains unbiased and fact-based. Let’s dive in.
Data Recovery Wizard is one of the many applications offered by EaseUS, a company that has been active in the recovery industry since 2005. It's popular for its generous free data recovery threshold, as well as its reliability in most data loss scenarios.
Wondershare Recoverit is another recovery tool that's well-established and trusted by many. It's the preferred tool for users who like to take advantage of its video repair feature, something that's not seen in many recovery applications.
Top EaseUS Pros
-
Scan results. Scan results are easy to navigate and grouped in a user-friendly file tree.
-
Scan speed. Scanning is very fast and doesn't make you wait a long time for results.
-
Free recovery. The software lets you recover up to 2 GB of data for free if you agree to mention the product on a social media network.
Top Recoverit Pros
-
Modern interface. The interface is modern and up-to-date. There are options to scan folders and other specific locations, like the Recycle Bin. But, this is primarily a cosmetic addition that does little to aid with recovery outside of user experience.
-
Create bootable disks. The program can create bootable disks that bypass the operating system, allowing you to recover your data.
-
Video Repair. The program can repair video files that refuse to play.
Top EaseUS Cons
-
Pop-up ads. Pop-up ads for other products appear frequently, and they can't be turned off.
-
Inaccurate time estimations. When the software estimates how much time an operation will likely take, the displayed time is almost always wrong.
-
Limited preview capabilities. The formats supported for previews are very limited, and even popular photo formats are not always viewable.
Top Recoverit Cons
-
False positives for bad sectors on Bitlocker devices. When scanning Bitlocker-encrypted devices, the program shows that there are bad sectors. This is a false positive.
-
Scanning Bitlocker-encrypted devices. In order to scan devices encrypted by Bitlocker, you need to unlock them in the operating system.
-
Confirming Bitlocker status. In order for the program to detect that the Bitlocker volume is unlocked, it needs to restart.
Pricing • Business model
| 1 | Distributed as | Freemium | Freemium |
| 2 | Trial version available | ||
| 3 | Trial version limitations | Recover up to 2 GB for free | Recover up to 100 MB for free |
| 4 | Number of devices per license |
|
|
| 5 | Starting price | $69.95/ 1 month | $59.99/ 1 month |
| 6 | License model | Subscription + Lifetime | Subscription + Lifetime |
| 7 | No credit card to try | ||
| 8 | Money back guarantee | ||
| 9 | See Plans & Pricing | Pricing details | Pricing details |
EaseUS Data Recovery Wizard and Wondershare Recoverit are very similarly priced, with Recoverit being just slightly cheaper. Wondershare Recoverit has three different plans for personal users, each allowing you to purchase on a monthly, yearly, or lifetime basis. The lowest plan, Essential, offers only file recovery. The highest plan, Premium, gives you full access to the software, including the bootable toolkit and advanced recovery features. EaseUS makes it a little bit simpler, offering full access to the software with the option of monthly, yearly, or lifetime licenses, each one coming with free upgrades.
EaseUS Data Recovery Wizard offers a much better allocation for free data recovery at 2GB as opposed to the 100MB offered by Wondershare Recoverit, which is great for trialing the software. If you’re looking for barebones recovery, Wondershare Recoverit’s Essential license is the cheapest of the two. But, if you’re looking for more reliable recovery (which we’ll discuss later), consider spending just a little bit more on an EaseUS Data Recovery Wizard license.
Data Recovery Performance
A data recovery application can have all the bells and whistles, but none of that is important if it struggles to adequately recover your files. How well can each recovery tool recover your lost data from various file systems? Let’s take a look.
Clever In-Depth Scan of File Systems
| 1 | FAT32 partitions | Partial support | Partial support |
| 2 | exFAT partitions | Partial support | Partial support |
| 3 | NTFS partitions | Full support | Partial support |
| 4 | EXT4 partitions | Not supported | Not supported |
| 5 | HFS+ partitions | Full support | Not supported |
| 6 | APFS partitions | Not supported | Not supported |
As you can see, EaseUS Data Recovery Wizard offers support for more file systems with its deep scan. It has full support for common file systems like NTFS and HFS+. On the other hand, Wondershare Recoverit only offers partial support for any file system it recovers from, and the Windows version doesn’t support recovery from drives with macOS file systems.
Quick Scan of File Systems
| 1 | FAT32 partitions | Partial support | Poor perfomance |
| 2 | exFAT partitions | Partial support | Poor perfomance |
| 3 | NTFS partitions | Full support | Full support |
| 4 | EXT4 partitions | Not supported | Not supported |
| 5 | HFS+ partitions | Not supported | Not supported |
| 6 | APFS partitions | Not supported | Not supported |
The efficiency of a quick scan determines how well it can quickly recover files that were recently deleted based on the file system that was used. Neither of the recovery tools support the quick scan of EXT4, HFS+, or APFS partitions. Although both offer full support for NTFS, only EaseUS has partial support for FAT32 and exFAT partitions, making it the superior option in terms of quick scan support.
Other Scan Types
| 1 | The number of formats supported by deep scan | Some (≈200) | Many (≈1000) |
| 2 | BitLocker support | Full support | Partial support |
| 3 | Windows shadow copies scanning | Not supported | Not supported |
| 4 | Scan for lost partitions | Not supported | Partial support |
| 5 | Recovered files' labeling | Full support | Not supported |
| 6 | Partial file recovery | Full support | Full support |
| 7 | Disk images: scan and recovery | Not supported | Not supported |
A well-rounded data recovery tool will offer other scan types. Both EaseUS and Wondershare Recoverit offer file discovery by file signature, but Wondershare Recoverit supports a lot more formats. It also offers partial support for discovering lost partitions, which isn’t supported at all by EaseUS. However, EaseUS offers full support for BitLocker-encrypted drives, as well as the labeling of recovered files.
Real-Life Recovery Challenge
| 1 | Raw photo recovery | 76% | 57% |
| 2 | Video formats recovery | 62% | 45% |
| 3 | Document formats recovery | 69% | 42% |
Recovery performance is where the gap between the two starts to increase. EaseUS largely outperformed Wondershare Recoverit in the real-life recovery challenge that involved raw recovery. Wondershare Recoverit struggled to recover common file styles such as MP4 and MOV, as well as most other video formats. As a whole, EaseUS offered better support for a wide range of file types, many of which Wondershare Recoverit didn’t support at all, such as ERF, MXF, ACCDB, and RTF for example.
Feature Comparison
A good data recovery tool comes with additional features that add value to the application. They’re a great way to retain loyal users and add further functionality that could add an extra layer of protection against data loss.
Karma
84% | 79% | ||
| 1 | Update frequency | ||
| 2 | Updated recently | ||
| 3 | Changelog available | ||
| 4 | Latest Windows release supported | ||
| 5 | Genuine or clone? | ||
| 6 | Brand name popularity | ||
| 7 | Online market share | ||
| 8 | Maturity | ||
| 9 | Extensive knowledge base | ||
| 10 | Helpdesk support | ||
| 11 | Live chat | ||
| 12 | Phone support |
Both EaseUS Data Recovery Wizard and Wondershare Recoverit are regularly updated and have an active presence on social media. Support is also good for both applications, with each having helpdesk, live chat, and phone support channels. A changelog isn’t available for Wondershare Recoverit, so it’s not easy for users to review what changes have been made to the software.
Usability
74% | 67% | ||
| 1 | Modern user-friendly interface | ||
| 2 | Dark mode | ||
| 3 | Easy-to-locate features | ||
| 4 | Automatic implementation of multiple appropriate scanning methods without user interaction | ||
| 5 | Auto-resuming scans of failing drives | ||
| 6 | Auto-resuming backups of failing drives | ||
| 7 | Convenient source selection on start | ||
| 8 | Convenient file-by-file preview of recoverable items | ||
| 9 | Convenient thumbnail preview of recoverable items | ||
| 10 | Mount recoverable items as disk | ||
| 11 | Built-in updater | ||
| 12 | Multiple view modes in scan results | ||
| 13 | Hex view for recoverable items | ||
| 14 | Filter recoverable items by type | ||
| 15 | Search recoverable items by file names | ||
| 16 | Sort results | ||
| 17 | Multilingual UI | ||
| 18 | Simple deployment |
In terms of Usability, both applications are very similar, with EaseUS Data Recovery Wizard having a slight edge thanks to the ability to sort results. Aside from that, you’ll find that both EaseUS and Wondershare Recoverit feature a modern user interface that makes it easy to navigate and find what you’re looking for.
Device support
77% | 69% | ||
| 1 | Internal and external HDD | ||
| 2 | Internal and external SSD | ||
| 3 | USB thumb drives / Classic iPods (non-iOS) / FireWire devices | ||
| 4 | Memory cards | ||
| 5 | iOS devices | ||
| 6 | Android devices | ||
| 7 | Recovery from RAID1, 0, JBOD | ||
| 8 | Unmountable partitions |
Both recovery tools have similar support for devices, but EaseUS is just a bit better as it offers partial support for recovery from RAID setups. Neither of the recovery tools supports recovery from iOS or Android devices, but EaseUS does have a separate recovery tool, EaseUS MobiSaver, specifically for mobile recovery.
Other notable recovery features
29% | 29% | ||
| 1 | Overall non-intrusive read-only algorithms | ||
| 2 | Network recovery | ||
| 3 | Effectively filters out corrupted scan results | ||
| 4 | Byte-to-byte device backups | ||
| 5 | Bootable recovery drive creation | ||
| 6 | Convenient scan session management | ||
| 7 | Bad sector management | ||
| 8 | Recovery chance prediction | ||
| 9 | RAID reconstructor | ||
| 10 | Disk vitals monitoring and tracking during scan | ||
| 11 | Data protection | ||
| 12 | Links to in-lab recovery service for physically damaged devices | ||
| 13 | Scan speed | ||
| 14 | Scan free space only | ||
| 15 | Start file recovery without interrupting the scan | ||
| 16 | Preview recoverable items without interrupting the scan | ||
| 17 | Forensic features |
Both tools have some other notable recovery features, but nothing outstanding. You can create bootable recovery drives with either of the tools, allowing you to perform recovery even if the drive containing your operating system is compromised. EaseUS has scan session management so you can easily review scan results at a later time if needed. On the other hand, Wondershare Recoverit allows you to scan free space only, which isn’t possible with EaseUS.
Extras
7% | 13% | ||
| 1 | Disk space mapping | ||
| 2 | Disk clean up | ||
| 3 | Corrupted video repair tool | ||
| 4 | Corrupted photo repair tool | ||
| 5 | S.M.A.R.T. | ||
| 6 | Duplicate finder | ||
| 7 | Built-in disk space secure eraser | ||
| 8 | Disk cloning | ||
| 9 | Disk surface test | ||
| 10 | Secure data shredding |
After successful recovery, some videos may be corrupted due to the damage inflicted on the drive. Both recovery tools offer the ability to repair corrupted videos, but EaseUS only offers it as a separate option. Outside of this, there are no other extras found in either of the tools.
Wrapping Up
After a detailed look at what each data recovery tool has to offer, it’s clear that EaseUS Data Recovery Wizard comes out on top for this one. Both are similarly priced and relatively easy to use for a user of any level, but the similarities stop when it comes to recovery performance. EaseUS Data Recovery Wizard has better support for more file types, proving itself to be a more effective and reliable data recovery tool when compared to Wondershare Recoverit.
A good recovery solution with support for a wide range of file types.
Visit developer's websiteWhy choose EaseUS
Read full EaseUS Data Recovery Wizard for Windows reviewWhy choose Recoverit
Read full Wondershare Recoverit for Windows reviewMore software comparisons
In an effort to assist your search for the right data recovery tool for you, we strive to review and compare every data recovery tool we can. We follow the same format to ensure all of our comparisons are consistent. Check out some more of our software comparisons below:
3.81
3.37
3.43
4.30
3.43
3.04
14 publishings
Auckland, New Zealand
Jordan Jamieson-Mane is a content writer with a focus on technology-related content. He has spent much of his life studying and working with all types of technology. During his time as a writer, he has written countless articles in the field of data recovery, breaking down complex topics into articles that are easy to understand.
When he's not writing articles on data recovery, Jordan enjoys traveling the world, reading books, and building websites.
- DiskDigger Review – How Much Can It Dig Up?
- DiskGenius Review – Capable but Complicated
- UndeleteMyFiles Pro Review – Barely Recovers Anything
- MiniTool Power Data Recovery Review – How Powerful Is It?
- GetDataBack Pro Review: A Struggle to Get Data Back
Houston, Texas, United States
Nikolay Lankevich has over 15 years of strong experience in various fields and platform includes Disaster Recovery, Windows XP/7. System analysis, design, application (Inter/Intranet) development, and testing. Provided technical supports on desktop and laptops on Win-XP and Macintosh for about 2000 employees.